<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How TDD and Pairing Increase Production</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/</link>
	<description>Towards a Way of Excellence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:36:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Linktipps #12 :: Blackflash</title>
		<link>http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Linktipps #12 :: Blackflash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchycreek.com/?p=82#comment-314</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your need for speed, sponsored by TDD and pairing at me.andering &#8211; Willem van den Ende</title>
		<link>http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Your need for speed, sponsored by TDD and pairing at me.andering &#8211; Willem van den Ende</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchycreek.com/?p=82#comment-207</guid>
		<description>[...] in this post have been heavily inspired by GeePawHill (also known as American Mike Hill) &#8217;s  How TDD and Pairing increase production. These diagrams were meant to follow mikes&#8217; story. After they were done, another order [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in this post have been heavily inspired by GeePawHill (also known as American Mike Hill) &#8217;s  How TDD and Pairing increase production. These diagrams were meant to follow mikes&#8217; story. After they were done, another order [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 15:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchycreek.com/?p=82#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Good point. I always feel I&#039;m doing something wrong if a task is &quot;too easy to require pairing&quot;. In my experience automating such tasks is often a fun/challenging task in itself. The result is an automated process and happy programmers :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. I always feel I&#8217;m doing something wrong if a task is &#8220;too easy to require pairing&#8221;. In my experience automating such tasks is often a fun/challenging task in itself. The result is an automated process and happy programmers <img src='http://anarchycreek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchycreek.com/?p=82#comment-110</guid>
		<description>I just worked two days in pair doing TDD and I think the code which came out was of a much better quality than if I would have done it all by myself. Even my coworker admitted today as he started to work alone again that he did not got into TDD all by himself, whereas working together, this was no problem at all.  
Of course, as always, you need to make sure pairing is the right approach for the problem (whereas TDD almost always is). Common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just worked two days in pair doing TDD and I think the code which came out was of a much better quality than if I would have done it all by myself. Even my coworker admitted today as he started to work alone again that he did not got into TDD all by himself, whereas working together, this was no problem at all.<br />
Of course, as always, you need to make sure pairing is the right approach for the problem (whereas TDD almost always is). Common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unit testing done right &#8211; Better then sliced bread &#171; Perpetual Pursuit of Perfection</title>
		<link>http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Unit testing done right &#8211; Better then sliced bread &#171; Perpetual Pursuit of Perfection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchycreek.com/?p=82#comment-107</guid>
		<description>[...] never the bottleneck. Thinking is. Tests make development faster because they help to focus: &#8220;How TDD and Pairing Increase Production&#8221; and &#8220;They’re Called [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] never the bottleneck. Thinking is. Tests make development faster because they help to focus: &#8220;How TDD and Pairing Increase Production&#8221; and &#8220;They’re Called [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Ray</title>
		<link>http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchycreek.com/?p=82#comment-59</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you are working on a routine tedious task, how pairing with someone else will help you?&quot; -- how about by automating that task, so it never has been tedious again?

We&#039;re using COMPUTERS!  They were invented to replace tedious tasks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you are working on a routine tedious task, how pairing with someone else will help you?&#8221; &#8212; how about by automating that task, so it never has been tedious again?</p>
<p>We&#8217;re using COMPUTERS!  They were invented to replace tedious tasks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annette Neergaard-Möller</title>
		<link>http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Annette Neergaard-Möller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchycreek.com/?p=82#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Annette Neergaard-Möller=Annette Johansson=NDB
Tjena.
Att man skulle hitta dig bara sådär... Googlade tjänstehanterare och Klinteback-blogg-sogeti flipprade förbi. Kollade Sogeti/Umeå men hittade ingen e-mail så det fick bli lite mer Googlande på Klintebäck; Foto (jajemän, där var du. Tunnare hår annars samma Fredrik). Tillbaka i Umeå. Grattis till tre fina flickor (själv har jag två,4+9). Läste även ditt blogg-inlägg om 80-talet (kännde igen allt:-)). Projekt Heureka ... får kolla mer sedan
Har du någon annan e-post adress eller ska vi fortsätta träffas här?
/Annette (fortfarande Boråsare)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Annette Neergaard-Möller=Annette Johansson=NDB<br />
Tjena.<br />
Att man skulle hitta dig bara sådär&#8230; Googlade tjänstehanterare och Klinteback-blogg-sogeti flipprade förbi. Kollade Sogeti/Umeå men hittade ingen e-mail så det fick bli lite mer Googlande på Klintebäck; Foto (jajemän, där var du. Tunnare hår annars samma Fredrik). Tillbaka i Umeå. Grattis till tre fina flickor (själv har jag två,4+9). Läste även ditt blogg-inlägg om 80-talet (kännde igen allt:-)). Projekt Heureka &#8230; får kolla mer sedan<br />
Har du någon annan e-post adress eller ska vi fortsätta träffas här?<br />
/Annette (fortfarande Boråsare)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La qualité est un voyage &#171; L&#8217;avis de l&#8217;iguane</title>
		<link>http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>La qualité est un voyage &#171; L&#8217;avis de l&#8217;iguane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 03:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchycreek.com/?p=82#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] How TDD and Pairing Increase Production    Publié dans communication, informatique, organisation, réflexion, travail. Mots-clefs&#160;: accompagnement au changement, code, gain, productivité, qualité, serveur d&#039;intégration, serveur de build, source. Aucun commentaire &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How TDD and Pairing Increase Production    Publié dans communication, informatique, organisation, réflexion, travail. Mots-clefs&nbsp;: accompagnement au changement, code, gain, productivité, qualité, serveur d&#8217;intégration, serveur de build, source. Aucun commentaire &#187; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevlin Henney</title>
		<link>http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevlin Henney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchycreek.com/?p=82#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Nice to see my &quot;typing is not the bottleneck&quot; phrase beginning to catch on after all these years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see my &#8220;typing is not the bottleneck&#8221; phrase beginning to catch on after all these years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew G</title>
		<link>http://anarchycreek.com/2009/05/26/how-tdd-and-pairing-increase-production/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 09:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anarchycreek.com/?p=82#comment-49</guid>
		<description>As for me unit testing is always good and if there is any facilities to do that I do. But sometimes is hard and not worthwhile to implement due to environment. What is really useless is pair programming all the time. You must acknowledge that there a lot simple and template tasks that are routine. Instead of doing pair all the time let&#039;s have a lot of conversations on design issues. I don&#039;t hate pair itself, furthermore I need it from time to time. But it&#039;s twice hard to pair simple, template task.  

&quot;If there are a lot of idle developers, introduce pair programming so it would looks like everybody at work &quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for me unit testing is always good and if there is any facilities to do that I do. But sometimes is hard and not worthwhile to implement due to environment. What is really useless is pair programming all the time. You must acknowledge that there a lot simple and template tasks that are routine. Instead of doing pair all the time let&#8217;s have a lot of conversations on design issues. I don&#8217;t hate pair itself, furthermore I need it from time to time. But it&#8217;s twice hard to pair simple, template task.  </p>
<p>&#8220;If there are a lot of idle developers, introduce pair programming so it would looks like everybody at work &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
